翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ R v Lawrence ・ R v Leary ・ R v Licensing Court of Brisbane; Ex parte Daniell ・ R v Lifchus ・ R v Lipman ・ R v Loubser ・ R v Lovelass ・ R v Lucas ・ R v M (MR) ・ R v Mabula ・ R v Malmo-Levine; R v Caine ・ R v Mann ・ R v Manninen ・ R v Mapara ・ R v Marquard ・ R v Marshall ・ R v Marshall; R v Bernard ・ R v Martineau ・ R v Mataung ・ R v Mavros ・ R v McCraw ・ R v McCredie ・ R v McLean & Trinh ・ R v McManus and Harvey ・ R v Mercure ・ R v Miller ・ R v Mills ・ R v Mills (disambiguation) ・ R v Mkize ・ R v Mohan Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク R v Marshall ： ウィキペディア英語版 R v Marshall ''R v Marshall (No 1)'' () 3 S.C.R. 456 and ''R v Marshall (No 2)'' () 3 S.C.R. 533 are two decisions given by the Supreme Court of Canada on a single case regarding a treaty right to fish. ==Decision No. 1== The Court held in the first decision that the famous Donald Marshall's catching and selling of eels was valid under 1760 and 1761 treaties between the Mi'kmaq and Britain, and that federal fishery regulations governing a closed fishing season and the regulating and the requirement of licenses to fish and sell the catch would infringe the treaty right. In 1999, the court of appeal heard the Marshall case. The court of appeal indicated that the trial judge had made an error in law and, therefore, overturned the decision. (p. 89) The appeal Judge Justice Binnie stated that the trial judge’s error was in not focusing attention on the Maliseet-British treaty of 1 February 1760. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「R v Marshall」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.